dating online irkutsk - Radiometric dating not reliable
When I first got involved in the creationism/evolution controversy, back in early 1995, I looked around for an article or book that explained radiometric dating in a way that nonscientists could understand. Young-Earth creationists -- that is, creationists who believe that Earth is no more than 10,000 years old -- are fond of attacking radiometric dating methods as being full of inaccuracies and riddled with sources of error.
All these methods point to Earth being very, very old -- several billions of years old.
I found several good sources, but none that seemed both complete enough to stand alone and simple enough for a nongeologist to understand them.
Some isotopes can break down in more than one way -- in these cases, each different breakdown type has its own half-life.
The decay rate and therefore the half-life are fixed characteristics of an isotope. That's the first axiom of radiometric dating techniques: the half-life of a given isotope is a constant.
Contents: The half-life of a radioactive isotope is defined as the time it takes half of a sample of the element to decay.
A mathematical formula can be used to calculate the half-life from the number of breakdowns per second in a sample of the isotope.
So, if we know how much of the isotope was originally present, and how much there is now, we can easily calculate how long it would take for the missing amount to decay, and therefore how long it's been since that particular sample was formed.